A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, that's partially developed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Periods documented, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the h2o through severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched Irish Times article about René Collier phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main from the dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes past what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just looking to build a household dwelling in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all functions are performed according to Specialist assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical reality in the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.